MacBook nano or iPhone walks Slate online


John Markoff of The New York Times updated its article on a possible NETBOOK Apple - following the commentary to Steve Jobs - with an interesting about that is not unlike the early days of JesusPhone when Apple unidentified aircraft had been detected for the first time in the logs of some websites. A company of “search engine” would have seen in his logs, allowing John Markoff forward wave characteristics for possible future nano MacBook / MacBook touch / iPhone slate: “UPDATED: this seems to confirm the findings of an enterprise search engine has agreed to share with me if I did not disclose his name: the company has identified Web visits made by an Apple product not listed with a screen located between an iPhone and a MacBook. Is this the iPhone 3.0 or NetMac 1.0? ”

We would not be surprised if this is real: the original iPhone had been spotted online in this way to log web traffic. Other Apple computers were first detected, even though some of them-as multiprocessor Macs running the SETI programs or other work-distributed are never released. Unlike Markoff, we believe that Steve was completely honest when he said “we do not know how to build a computer under $ 500 that is not the junk”, stressing that the company’s mission was to provide more price equal, and not to offer less functionality for less. By relying solely on our instincts, we believe therefore to eliminate the assumption of a NETBOOK MacBook nano. Instead, if there is indeed a new Apple product is not listed, we here at Gizmodo is like an iPhone HD with a larger screen at 800 x 480 pixels, which would probably in 2009 .

This resolution is between the 480 x 320 pixels of the iPhone and 1280 x 800 pixels of a MacBook, which seems quite realistic. Other phones-like the HTC Touch-HD already have these ultra-precise screens. Moreover, as Steve pointed out when presenting financial results of the company before yesterday, they already have a solid foothold in the market for small computers with the iPhone. It is not only logical but also less risky and less-expensive to continue to improve the iPhone, providing the next model of a screen with better resolution.

Tags: , ,

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.